← Home

Figures and sources

Every figure the guide takes from a public document, with the document it comes from. Click a source to read it yourself. Each one says whether it has been checked against that document, and by whom (see the key below). If you have checked a figure against its source, use Check this beside it to say whether it matches.

How the 143 figures have been checked

Key

What’s changed

When a newer document gives a different figure for something an earlier one already covered, both are kept. The newer figure is listed below with its history; the older one isn’t deleted. Newest first.

24 Sep 2026 · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3

Rangeland Blvd extension - Cattle Gap Trl to Bexley Village Dr LRTP 114.2

Daily traffic 37

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Rangeland Blvd, the new segment, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 18,000 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Rangeland Blvd (printed three times: east of Cattle Gap Trl, and either side of S Branch Blvd) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bud Bexley Pkwy, Bexley Village Dr roundabout to Ballantrae Blvd, today (2023 counts) 2,100 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bud Bexley Pkwy between the roundabout and Ballantrae Blvd · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bud Bexley Pkwy, Bexley Village Dr roundabout to Ballantrae Blvd, 2050 no-build 6,900 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bud Bexley Pkwy between the roundabout and Ballantrae Blvd · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bud Bexley Pkwy, Bexley Village Dr roundabout to Ballantrae Blvd, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 16,500 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bud Bexley Pkwy between the roundabout and Ballantrae Blvd · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Gunn Hwy, south of SR 54, today (2023 counts) 18,400 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Gunn Hwy, below (south of) its SR 54 signal · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Gunn Hwy, south of SR 54, 2050 no-build 23,500 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Gunn Hwy, below (south of) its SR 54 signal · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Gunn Hwy, south of SR 54, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 23,500 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Gunn Hwy, below (south of) its SR 54 signal · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), S Branch Blvd, between Rangeland Blvd and SR 54, 2050 no-build 22,000 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on S Branch Blvd just north of SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), S Branch Blvd, between Rangeland Blvd and SR 54, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 15,500 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on S Branch Blvd just north of SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, toward SR 54, today (2023 counts) 14,300 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr just north of SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, toward SR 54, 2050 no-build 32,500 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr just north of SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, toward SR 54, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 22,500 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr just north of SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, by the roundabout, today (2023 counts) 6,100 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr just south of the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, by the roundabout, 2050 no-build 23,500 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr just south of the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, by the roundabout, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 21,500 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr just south of the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, north leg, today (2023 counts) 2,500 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr north-east of the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, north leg, 2050 no-build 15,500 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr north-east of the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Bexley Village Dr, north leg, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 14,500 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Bexley Village Dr north-east of the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Broad Porch Run, today (2023 counts) 3,500 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Broad Porch Run next to the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Broad Porch Run, 2050 no-build 5,000 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Broad Porch Run next to the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Broad Porch Run, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 7,000 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Broad Porch Run next to the roundabout · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Ballantrae Blvd, toward SR 54, today (2023 counts) 10,700 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Ballantrae Blvd just north of SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Ballantrae Blvd, toward SR 54, 2050 no-build 18,000 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Ballantrae Blvd just north of SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Ballantrae Blvd, toward SR 54, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 11,000 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Ballantrae Blvd just north of SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Ballantrae Blvd, just south of Bud Bexley Pkwy, today (2023 counts) 4,100 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Ballantrae Blvd just south of Bud Bexley Pkwy · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Ballantrae Blvd, just south of Bud Bexley Pkwy, 2050 no-build 7,100 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Ballantrae Blvd just south of Bud Bexley Pkwy · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Ballantrae Blvd, just south of Bud Bexley Pkwy, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 8,600 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, purple figure on Ballantrae Blvd just south of Bud Bexley Pkwy · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), SR 54, the two segments the board labels, today (2023 counts) 58,700–64,800 vehicles per day

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, the two purple figures on SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The board gives SR 54 a figure on two segments: 58,700 west of S Branch Blvd; 64,800 between Ballantrae Blvd and Sunlake Blvd. The eastern segment is not the same on every board, so compare years with care.

  • Daily traffic (AADT), SR 54, the two segments the board labels, 2050 no-build 63,500–69,000 vehicles per day

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, the two purple figures on SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The board gives SR 54 a figure on two segments: 63,500 west of S Branch Blvd; 69,000 between Bexley Village Dr and Ballantrae Blvd. The eastern segment is not the same on every board, so compare years with care.

  • Daily traffic (AADT), SR 54, the two segments the board labels, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E 56,500–62,500 vehicles per day

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, the two purple figures on SR 54 · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The board gives SR 54 a figure on two segments: 56,500 west of S Branch Blvd; 62,500 between Bexley Village Dr and Ballantrae Blvd. The eastern segment is not the same on every board, so compare years with care.

  • Daily traffic (AADT), SR 54 between Gunn Hwy and US 41, FDOT's five count sites, 2025 49,000–65,500 vehicles per day

    Portable traffic monitoring sites, 2025 annual average daily traffic (Transportation Data and Analytics) · sites 145119 (east of Gunn Hwy, 49,000), 145603 (west of the Suncoast Pkwy, 55,000), 145602 (0.5 mi east of the Suncoast Pkwy, 57,500), 145601 (0.5 mi east of Ballantrae Blvd, 65,500), 145600 (0.4 mi west of US 41, 60,000) · 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    FDOT counts, not the county's board: the board's 2023 figures for SR 54 are listed separately, for two segments.

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Suncoast Pkwy between the Hillsborough County line and SR 54, FDOT count, 2025 65,900 vehicles per day

    Portable traffic monitoring sites, 2025 annual average daily traffic (Transportation Data and Analytics) · site 970340, main line 0.7 mi north of the Hillsborough County line · 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Suncoast Pkwy between SR 54 and Ridge Rd, FDOT count, 2025 55,300 vehicles per day

    Portable traffic monitoring sites, 2025 annual average daily traffic (Transportation Data and Analytics) · site 970360, main line north of the Anclote toll plaza (mile marker 23.372) · 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    FDOT counts this stretch at one site, north of where Rangeland Blvd would cross, and applies the figure to the whole stretch from SR 54 northward.

  • Daily traffic (AADT), US 41 between SR 54 and Sundance Lake Blvd, FDOT's four count sites, 2025 33,000–48,000 vehicles per day

    Portable traffic monitoring sites, 2025 annual average daily traffic (Transportation Data and Analytics) · sites 145303 (north of SR 54, 48,000), 140029 (south of Ehren Cutoff, 45,000), 145500 (north of Ehren Cutoff, 44,000), 145511 (south of Sundance Lake Blvd, 33,000) · 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Suncoast Pkwy between W Lutz Lake Fern Rd and SR 54, 2050 forecast in the Turnpike's widening study (parkway widened, no Rangeland Blvd interchange) 93,000 vehicles per day

    Noise Study Report, Widening Suncoast Pkwy (SR 589) PD&E, Van Dyke Road to SR 52 · appendix, traffic data sheet "Build, 2050 (without Rangeland Blvd Interchange)", PDF page 37, demand two-way AADT column · Nov 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Daily traffic (AADT), Suncoast Pkwy between SR 54 and Ridge Rd, 2050 forecast in the Turnpike's widening study (parkway widened, no Rangeland Blvd interchange) 75,400 vehicles per day

    Noise Study Report, Widening Suncoast Pkwy (SR 589) PD&E, Van Dyke Road to SR 52 · appendix, traffic data sheet "Build, 2050 (without Rangeland Blvd Interchange)", PDF page 37, demand two-way AADT column · Nov 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    With a Rangeland Blvd interchange, the next sheet (PDF page 38) gives 87,800 between SR 54 and Rangeland Blvd and 75,800 between Rangeland Blvd and Ridge Rd.

  • Daily traffic (AADT), SR 54 either side of the Suncoast Pkwy, 2050 forecast in the Turnpike's widening study (parkway widened, no Rangeland Blvd interchange) 94,400–98,400 vehicles per day

    Noise Study Report, Widening Suncoast Pkwy (SR 589) PD&E, Van Dyke Road to SR 52 · appendix, traffic data sheet "Build, 2050 (without Rangeland Blvd Interchange)", PDF page 37, demand two-way AADT column: 98,400 west of the parkway, 94,400 east · Nov 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    With a Rangeland Blvd interchange, the next sheet gives 76,400 west and 72,400 east.

Road design 6

  • Travel lanes on the proposed Rangeland Blvd, both typical sections (two each way) 4 lanes

    Typical sections board · both drawings: two 11-foot travel lanes each side of the median · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 29 Sep 2026Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • Median width, standard typical section (Alternative A throughout) 22 feet

    Typical sections board · lower drawing, "22′ Median" · 24 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • Median width, wider typical section (Alternatives D and E, South Branch Blvd to Bexley Village Dr) 44 feet

    Typical sections board · upper drawing, "44′ Median" · 24 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • Design vehicle the proposed Rangeland Blvd is designed to accommodate WB-40

    Corrections and clarifications to this guide, by email · section "04 How the Rangeland study fits into the larger Pasco plan": "designed to accommodate a WB-40 vehicle ... a medium sized semitrailer" · 14 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • Wheelbase of the WB-40 design vehicle ("intermediate semitrailer"), the two wheelbases added together 38 feet

    Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (Florida Greenbook), 2016 edition · Chapter 3, Table 3-2 Design Vehicles (page 3-13, PDF page 77): WB-40, wheelbase 12.5 + 25.5 = 38 · Apr 2016 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • Overall length of the WB-40 design vehicle ("intermediate semitrailer") 45.5 feet

    Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (Florida Greenbook), 2016 edition · Chapter 3, Table 3-2 Design Vehicles (PDF page 77): WB-40, overall length 45.5 · Apr 2016 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

The project 3

Schedule and process 7

Funding (county capital improvement plan) 7

Trucks 2

  • Trucks as a share of daily traffic, existing segments of the Rangeland Blvd corridor 4%

    Corrections and clarifications to this guide, by email · sections "01 Key Takeaways" and "06 Trucks and noise": "About 4% of the daily traffic volumes are trucks" · 14 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

    The letter says "about". It expects the share to rise once the segments are connected, but to stay below SR 54.

  • Trucks as a share of daily traffic, the parallel segment of SR 54 12%

    Corrections and clarifications to this guide, by email · sections "01 Key Takeaways" and "06 Trucks and noise": "About 12% of the traffic along the parallel segment of SR 54 are trucks" · 14 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

    The letter says "about".

Statements, designations and quotes 6

  • What the county expects of the corridor's truck share once the segments are connected “It is anticipated that the truck percentage along the Rangeland Blvd. corridor will increase after the existing segments are connected but remain below the parallel SR 54 corridor.”

    Corrections and clarifications to this guide, by email · sections "01 Key Takeaways" and "06 Trucks and noise" · 14 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • Where the county expects the corridor's future truck volumes to sit “The future truck volumes are likely to remain below the parallel segment of SR 54, but above the local roadway network.”

    Corrections and clarifications to this guide, by email · section "04 How the Rangeland study fits into the larger Pasco plan" · 14 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • When construction will happen, according to the project schedule board “Construction is TBD”

    Project schedule board, Public Workshop #3 · Notes: "Schedule is subject to change", "Construction is TBD" · 24 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • What the county says connecting the corridor will make it “By connecting the existing and planned segments of Rangeland Blvd, Bud Bexley Parkway, and Tower Road together, the corridor will serve as a regional collector that enhances connectivity to the surrounding areas.”

    Corrections and clarifications to this guide, by email · section "01 Key Takeaways" · 14 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

  • Status of a Suncoast Parkway interchange at Rangeland Blvd, from the Turnpike study's project manager “Advancement of the Rangeland Boulevard interchange to the design and construction phases has been suspended until Pasco County demonstrates stakeholder support and confirms that the Bud Bexley Parkway and Bexley Village Drive intersection will operate acceptably with the interchange through the year 2050.”

    Email on the Suncoast Parkway PD&E Study (FPID 448068-1) project status, in reply to a resident's inquiry · second paragraph · 28 Aug 2025 · Verified by a human 29 Sep 2026Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

    The next sentence reads: "Once support is demonstrated and funding is identified for the interchange, the interchange will be reevaluated."

  • Whether an interchange or six-lane section is part of the Rangeland route study, according to the county “No interchange or six-lane section is currently being considered for approval in the Rangeland Blvd Route Study.”

    Corrections and clarifications to this guide, by email · section "02 Project Overview" · 14 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 29 Sep 2026

Intersection grades (level of service, evening peak) 33

  • Level of service, evening peak, Rangeland Blvd at Gunn Hwy, today (2023 counts) Grade A

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Rangeland Blvd / Gunn Hwy junction (top of the Gunn Hwy inset); printed as A (A), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Rangeland Blvd at Gunn Hwy, 2050 no-build Grade F

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Rangeland Blvd / Gunn Hwy junction (top of the Gunn Hwy inset); printed as F (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Rangeland Blvd at Gunn Hwy, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade C

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Rangeland Blvd / Gunn Hwy junction (top of the Gunn Hwy inset); printed as C (C), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Rangeland Blvd at Cattle Gap Trl, today (2023 counts) Grade A

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Cattle Gap Trl roundabout (Gunn Hwy inset); printed as A (A), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Rangeland Blvd at Cattle Gap Trl, 2050 no-build Grade A

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Cattle Gap Trl roundabout (Gunn Hwy inset); printed as A (A), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Rangeland Blvd at Cattle Gap Trl, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade A

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Cattle Gap Trl roundabout (Gunn Hwy inset); printed as A (A), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Bexley Village Dr roundabout, today (2023 counts) Grade A

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bexley Village Dr roundabout; printed as A (A), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Bexley Village Dr roundabout, 2050 no-build Grade F

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bexley Village Dr roundabout; printed as E (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Bexley Village Dr roundabout, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade D

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bexley Village Dr roundabout; printed as C (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Bud Bexley Pkwy at Ballantrae Blvd, today (2023 counts) Grade C

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bud Bexley Pkwy / Ballantrae Blvd junction; printed as A (C), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Bud Bexley Pkwy at Ballantrae Blvd, 2050 no-build Grade D

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bud Bexley Pkwy / Ballantrae Blvd junction; printed as E (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, Bud Bexley Pkwy at Ballantrae Blvd, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade D

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bud Bexley Pkwy / Ballantrae Blvd junction; printed as D (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Gunn Hwy, today (2023 counts) Grade D

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Gunn Hwy signal (bottom of the Gunn Hwy inset); printed as D (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Gunn Hwy, 2050 no-build Grade F

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Gunn Hwy signal (bottom of the Gunn Hwy inset); printed as F (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Gunn Hwy, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade F

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Gunn Hwy signal (bottom of the Gunn Hwy inset); printed as F (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at S Branch Blvd, today (2023 counts) Grade C

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / S Branch Blvd signal; printed as B (C), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at S Branch Blvd, 2050 no-build Grade E

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / S Branch Blvd signal; printed as D (E), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at S Branch Blvd, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade D

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / S Branch Blvd signal; printed as C (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Suncoast Pkwy ramps, west, today (2023 counts) Grade B

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the west ramp signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset); printed as C (B), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Suncoast Pkwy ramps, west, 2050 no-build Grade E

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the west ramp signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset); printed as F (E), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Suncoast Pkwy ramps, west, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade D

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the west ramp signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset); printed as E (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Board gives E (D): E in the morning peak, D in the evening. See correction 2.

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Suncoast Pkwy ramps, east, today (2023 counts) Grade C

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the east ramp signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset); printed as B (C), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Suncoast Pkwy ramps, east, 2050 no-build Grade F

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the east ramp signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset); printed as F (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Suncoast Pkwy ramps, east, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade D

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the east ramp signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset); printed as E (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Board gives E (D): E in the morning peak, D in the evening. See correction 2.

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Bexley Village Dr, today (2023 counts) Grade D

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bexley Village Dr signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset, right); printed as C (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Bexley Village Dr, 2050 no-build Grade F

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bexley Village Dr signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset, right); printed as F (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Bexley Village Dr, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade F

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the Bexley Village Dr signal (Suncoast Pkwy inset, right); printed as E (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Ballantrae Blvd, today (2023 counts) Grade C

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Ballantrae Blvd signal; printed as C (C), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The county's 14 September letter gives different grades; this follows the boards. See correction 3.

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Ballantrae Blvd, 2050 no-build Grade E

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Ballantrae Blvd signal; printed as F (E), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The county's 14 September letter gives different grades; this follows the boards. See correction 3.

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Ballantrae Blvd, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade D

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Ballantrae Blvd signal; printed as D (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The county's 14 September letter gives different grades; this follows the boards. See correction 3.

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Sunlake Blvd, today (2023 counts) Grade D

    Existing traffic board (2023 counts), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Sunlake Blvd signal; printed as C (D), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Sunlake Blvd, 2050 no-build Grade F

    2050 no-build traffic board, Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Sunlake Blvd signal; printed as F (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Level of service, evening peak, SR 54 at Sunlake Blvd, 2050 build, Alternatives A, D and E Grade F

    Predicted traffic - Alternative A, D & E (2050 build board), Public Workshop #3 · page 1, at the SR 54 / Sunlake Blvd signal; printed as F (F), i.e. morning (evening) · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

Cost 13

  • Construction cost estimate, Alternative A, September 2026 $100.1M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Preliminary Construction Cost', Alternative A column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Revised 2 versions — show history
    1. $93.18M Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · Cost section, row 'Preliminary Construction Cost', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026
    2. $100.1M current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026
  • Total cost estimate, Alternative A, September 2026 $150.0M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Total Preliminary Cost Estimate', Alternative A column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Revised 2 versions — show history
    1. $111.82M Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · Cost section, row 'Total Preliminary Cost Estimate', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026
    2. $150.0M current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026

    Not measured the same way. January's printed total adds up construction, design and inspection only; September's also includes land and wetland mitigation. Counting the same items on both, the rise is smaller than these two figures suggest - section 7 of the guide works it through.

  • Construction cost estimate, Alternative D, September 2026 $101.4M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Preliminary Construction Cost', Alternative D column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Total cost estimate, Alternative D, September 2026 $151.5M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Total Preliminary Cost Estimate', Alternative D column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Construction cost estimate, Alternative E, September 2026 $106.7M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Preliminary Construction Cost', Alternative E column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Total cost estimate, Alternative E, September 2026 $157.8M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Total Preliminary Cost Estimate', Alternative E column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Design (10%), Alternative A, September 2026 $10.0M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Design (10%)', Alternative A column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Construction engineering and inspection (8%), Alternative A, September 2026 $8.0M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Construction Engineering & Inspection (8%)', Alternative A column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Land for the roadway, Alternative A, September 2026 $11.3M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Preliminary right-of-way acquisition for roadway', Alternative A column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Land for stormwater ponds, Alternative A, September 2026 $6.2M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Preliminary right-of-way acquisition for pond sites', Alternative A column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Land for floodplain compensation, Alternative A, September 2026 $5.8M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Preliminary right-of-way acquisition for floodplain compensation sites', Alternative A column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Wetland mitigation, Alternative A, September 2026 $8.6M

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · Cost section, row 'Wetland mitigation', Alternative A column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

  • Wetland mitigation cost per acre used in the September 2026 matrix $203,000 per acre

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · footnote 2: "Wetland mitigation cost is calculated using a cost of $203,000 per acre." · 24 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

Alternatives matrix 8

  • Potential impacts to noise conditions, Alternatives A, D and E, September 2026 matrix Medium (rating)

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · row 'Potential impacts to noise conditions (Low/Medium/High)' · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 29 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Footnote 3 on the matrix: "Two noise impacted areas were identified on the corridor."

    Revised 2 versions — show history
    1. High (rating) Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · row 'Potential impacts to noise conditions (Low/Medium/High)', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Verified by a human 29 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026 Build B was also rated High. Both build alternatives compared then had the same rating.
    2. Medium (rating) current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026
  • Potential impacts to noise conditions, No-Build, September 2026 matrix None (rating)

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · row 'Potential impacts to noise conditions (Low/Medium/High)', No-Build Alternative column · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 29 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The January 2025 matrix also rated the no-build None.

  • Potential impacts to contamination sites, Alternatives A, D and E, September 2026 matrix Low (rating)

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · row 'Potential impacts to contamination sites (Low/Medium/High)' · 24 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Revised 2 versions — show history
    1. High (rating) Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · row 'Potential impacts to contamination sites (Low/Medium/High)', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026
    2. Low (rating) current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026
  • Potential impacts to threatened and endangered species, Alternatives A, D and E, September 2026 matrix Medium (rating)

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · row 'Potential impacts to threatened and endangered species (Low/Medium/High)' · 24 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The no-build is rated None.

    Reconfirmed 2 versions — show history
    1. Medium (rating) Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · row 'Potential impacts to threatened and endangered species (Low/Medium/High)', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026 Build B was also rated Medium; the no-build None.
    2. Medium (rating) current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026
  • Historical and archaeological sites potentially affected, Alternatives A, D and E, September 2026 matrix Medium (rating)

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · row 'Historical and Archaeological site potentially affected (Low/Medium/High)' · 24 Sep 2026 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    The no-build is rated None.

    Reconfirmed 2 versions — show history
    1. Medium (rating) Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · row 'Historical and Archaeological site potentially affected (Low/Medium/High)', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026 Build B was also rated Medium; the no-build None.
    2. Medium (rating) current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026
  • Wetlands affected, Alternatives A and D, September 2026 matrix 33.93 acres

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · row 'Potential impacts to wetlands (Acres)' · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Alternative E is 33.97 acres.

    Revised 2 versions — show history
    1. 24.11 acres Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · row 'Potential impacts to wetlands (Acres)', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026
    2. 33.93 acres current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026
  • Surface waters affected, Alternatives A, D and E, September 2026 matrix 9.57 acres

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · row 'Potential impacts to surface waters (Acres)' · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Revised 2 versions — show history
    1. 0.00 acres Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · row 'Potential impacts to surface waters (Acres)', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026
    2. 9.57 acres current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026
  • Parcels impacted, Alternatives A, D and E, September 2026 matrix 27 parcels

    Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · row 'Parcels Impacted' · 24 Sep 2026 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026

    Revised 2 versions — show history
    1. 19 parcels Rangeland Blvd alternatives evaluation matrix · row 'Parcels Impacted', Build Condition A column · 18 Jan 2025 · Verified by a human 26 Sep 2026Checked by AI 28 Sep 2026
    2. 27 parcels current · Alternatives evaluation matrix, Public Workshop #3 · 24 Sep 2026

Sunlake Blvd corridor - Center Village Dr to Anchor Dune Dr MPO 454568-1 (southern segment)

The project 1

Road design 6

Schedule and process 5

Funding (county capital improvement plan) 8

  • County capital improvement plan, Sunlake Blvd (north of Bud Bexley Pkwy to south of the Angeline line), FY 2026 (adopted) $4.2M

    Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget (includes the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan) · FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, Road Improvements table, printed page 124 (PDF page 129), row 'Sunlake Bl(N Bud Bexley to S Angeli', column 'FY 2026 Adopted' · 16 Sep 2025 · Not yet checked

  • County capital improvement plan, Sunlake Blvd (north of Bud Bexley Pkwy to south of the Angeline line), FY 2027 (proposed) $4.645M

    Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget (includes the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan) · FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, Road Improvements table, printed page 124 (PDF page 129), row 'Sunlake Bl(N Bud Bexley to S Angeli', column 'FY 2027 Proposed' · 16 Sep 2025 · Not yet checked

  • County capital improvement plan, Sunlake Blvd (north of Bud Bexley Pkwy to south of the Angeline line), FY 2028 (proposed) $16.324M

    Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget (includes the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan) · FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, Road Improvements table, printed page 124 (PDF page 129), row 'Sunlake Bl(N Bud Bexley to S Angeli', column 'FY 2028 Proposed' · 16 Sep 2025 · Not yet checked

  • County capital improvement plan, Sunlake Blvd (north of Bud Bexley Pkwy to south of the Angeline line), FY 2029 (proposed) $7.826M

    Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget (includes the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan) · FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, Road Improvements table, printed page 124 (PDF page 129), row 'Sunlake Bl(N Bud Bexley to S Angeli', column 'FY 2029 Proposed' · 16 Sep 2025 · Not yet checked

  • County capital improvement plan, Sunlake Blvd (north of Bud Bexley Pkwy to south of the Angeline line), FY 2030 (proposed) $0.0M

    Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget (includes the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan) · FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, Road Improvements table, printed page 124 (PDF page 129), row 'Sunlake Bl(N Bud Bexley to S Angeli', column 'FY 2030 Proposed' · 16 Sep 2025 · Not yet checked

  • County capital improvement plan, Sunlake Blvd (north of Bud Bexley Pkwy to south of the Angeline line), future years, after FY 2030 $0.0M

    Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget (includes the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan) · FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, Road Improvements table, printed page 124 (PDF page 129), row 'Sunlake Bl(N Bud Bexley to S Angeli', column 'Future Funding' · 16 Sep 2025 · Not yet checked

  • County capital improvement plan, Sunlake Blvd (south of the Angeline line to south of Wilton Way), FY 2026 (adopted) $9.581M

    Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget (includes the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan) · FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, Road Improvements table, printed page 124 (PDF page 129), row 'Sunlake Bl(S Anglin to S Wilton Wy)', column 'FY 2026 Adopted' · 16 Sep 2025 · Not yet checked

    The FY 2027-2030 and future-funding columns on this row are $0.

  • County capital improvement plan, Sunlake Blvd (south of Wilton Way to Anchor Dune Dr), FY 2026 (adopted) $29.0M

    Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget (includes the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan) · FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, Road Improvements table, printed page 124 (PDF page 129), row 'Sunlake Bl(S Wilt Wy to Anch Dn Dr)', column 'FY 2026 Adopted' · 16 Sep 2025 · Not yet checked

    The FY 2027-2030 and future-funding columns on this row are $0.

Definitions

Terms the site uses. Where a definition is quoted from a document, it names the document; a word marked with a small dagger (†) on a project page opens its definition here.

The documents

Every document the guide draws on. The count is how many figures above come from it; a document with none is cited in the guide’s text rather than for a figure.